xxxxxxxxxx
// StringBuffer and StringBuilder are both used for manipulating strings in Java.
// The main difference between them is that StringBuffer is synchronized (thread-safe),
// while StringBuilder is not (not thread-safe).
// If you require thread-safety, such as when manipulating strings in a concurrent environment,
// you should use StringBuffer. However, if you do not require thread-safety, StringBuilder
// is generally more efficient and faster.
// Here's an example to demonstrate the basic usage of StringBuffer and StringBuilder:
// Using StringBuffer
StringBuffer stringBuffer = new StringBuffer();
stringBuffer.append("Hello");
stringBuffer.append(" World");
String result1 = stringBuffer.toString();
System.out.println(result1);
// Using StringBuilder
StringBuilder stringBuilder = new StringBuilder();
stringBuilder.append("Hello");
stringBuilder.append(" World");
String result2 = stringBuilder.toString();
System.out.println(result2);
xxxxxxxxxx
The StringBuffer and StringBuilder class both produces mutable string objects.
The main difference between them is that StringBuffer is thread safe;
StringBuilder is not thread safe.
xxxxxxxxxx
The StringBuffer and StringBuilder class both produces mutable string objects.
The main difference between them is that StringBuffer is thread safe;
StringBuilder is not thread safe.
String is immutable and thread safe.
We are using StringBuffer when we are doing parallel
testing since it is a thread safe.
xxxxxxxxxx
They both mutable, they are exactly same but
String buffer is thread safe so it runs slower
than String builder.
We are using StringBuffer when we are doing parallel
testing since it is a thread safe.
xxxxxxxxxx
StringBuffer:
1. StringBuffer class is synchronized
2. It is thread-safe
3. It is slower than StringBuilder
StringBuilder:
1. StringBuilder class is not synchronized
2. It is not thread-safe
3. It is faster than StringBuffer